- #ADOBE PREMIERE CS6 PARA MAC MAC OS#
- #ADOBE PREMIERE CS6 PARA MAC MOVIE#
- #ADOBE PREMIERE CS6 PARA MAC PRO#
#ADOBE PREMIERE CS6 PARA MAC MAC OS#
Another source for replacement GPUs like the Radeon HD 4870, Quadro FX 4500, and GeForce GTX 285 is the AppleMacanix eBay store.Index of photoshop cc 2014 0 ) Mac OS X, Windows Vista or newer Big Rig: November 2016 CC 2018 (19. They can be purchased from special sources like MacVidCards eBay Store - who supplied our test samples. They are NOT available from the Apple Store and you can't just order them from Amazon. The samples we used have been flashed with firmware to support both OS X and Windows.
#ADOBE PREMIERE CS6 PARA MAC PRO#
You could use the MBA to run Premiere Pro but it would be a big step down from both the Mac Pro and MacBook Pro.Īs you can see, we included the Radeon HD 6870, GeForce GTX 570, and GeForce GTX 580 in the mix. Just not equal.Īs for the 'mid 2012' MacBook Air top model (2.0GHz Core i7), it took and average of three times longer than the 2012 Retina MacBook Pro to render a collection of five video effects in Premiere Pro. It doesn't mean using a MacBook Pro is a bad idea. Taking combined CPU and GPU performance into consideration, the RMBP is NOT the equal of the 2010 (or 2012 'speed bump') Mac Pro - especially if you have a high-end NVIDIA GPU. So is the 2012 MacBook Pro equal to the 2010 Mac Pro as a Premiere Pro platform? It depends on what functions you use most and what GPU you are sporting. However the Retina MacBook Pro rendered Unsharp Mask 54% faster than the fastest 2012 MacBook Air. In that case, the 6-core Mac Pro we used in the test rendered that effect 30% faster than the fastest 2012 MacBook Pro. What about video effects that are NOT CUDA or OpenCL accelerated? We included Unsharp Mask as an example of a video effect that leans on the CPU rather than GPU. You could say the Retina MacBook Pro was in the middle of the "pack." On the other hand, the Mac Pro with Quadro 4000 rendered the same five effects an average of 27% faster than the Retina MacBook Pro with GeForce GT 650M. The 2012 Retina MacBook Pro's GeForce GT 650M rendered a collection of five GPU accelerated video effects an average of 21% faster than the Mac Pro with Radeon HD 5870. But the AMD GPUs were not "slouches." On the other hand, the MacBook Airs with the Intel HD 30 integrated GPU were slow. **NOTE: Radeon HD 6870, GeForce GTX 570 ,and GeForce GTX 580 provided courtesy of MacVidCards eBay Store.Įvery Mac with an NVIDIA GPU and CUDA support rendered Premiere Pro CS6 GPU accelerated video effects in the shortest time.
#ADOBE PREMIERE CS6 PARA MAC MOVIE#
Test movie was a 32 second Apple ProRes 422 (HQ) 1920x1080 23.98fps. IMac 3.4 R69 = 'mid 2011' iMac 3.4GHz Quad-Core i7, AMD Radeon HD 6970 GPUĢ012 RMBP 2.7 = 'mid 2012' Retina MacBook Pro 2.7GHz Quad-Core i7, NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M GPUĢ011 MBP 2.5 = 'late 2011' MacBook Pro 2.5GHz Quad-Core i7, Radeon HD 6770M GPUĢ012 MBA 2.0 = 'mid 2012' MacBook Air 2.0GHz Dual-Core i7, Intel HD 4000 GPUĢ011 MBA 1.8 = 'mid 2011' MacBook Air 1.8GHz Dual-Core i7, Intel HD 3000 GPU MP 3.3 R57 = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz Hex-Core, AMD Radeon HD 5770 GPU MP 3.3 R58 = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz Hex-Core, AMD Radeon HD 5870 GPU MP 3.3 G28 = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz Hex-Core, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 GPU MP 3.3 G57 = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz Hex-Core, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 GPU ** MP 3.3 G58 = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz Hex-Core, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 GPU ** MP 3.3 Q40 = 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz Hex-Core, NVIDIA Quadro 4000 GPU
0 kommentar(er)
